ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The coronavirus pandemic has had an extremely negative impact on the patients with diabetes mellitus (DM both in terms of a more severe course of COVID-19 and an increased risk of death. AIM: Analysis of risk factors for death due to COVID-19 in patients with DM type 1 and type 2 (DM1 and DM2). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of the database of the national diabetes register (NDR), which included DM patients with COVID-19 and reported virus infection outcome (recovery/or death) in 15 712 DM1 and 322 279 DM2 patients during a 2-year follow-up period (01/02/2020 to 03/04/2022) (discharge date)). RESULTS: Case fatality rate in patients with DM, who underwent COVID-19 was 17.1% (DM1-8.8%;DM2-17.5%). As a result of multivariate regression analysis of seven significant factors in DM1 and thirteen in DM2 (evaluated by univariate anlisys), a number of the most important predictors of risk for fatal outcome were identified: in DM1 these were age >= 65 years (OR =4.01, 95% CI: 1.42-11.36), presence of arterial hypertension (AH) (OR =2.72, 95% CI: 1.03-7.16) and diabetic foot syndrome (DFS) (OR = 7.22, 95% CI: 1.98-26.29);for T2DM: age >= 65 years (OR =2.53, 95% CI: 1.96-3.27), male (OR =1.51, 95% CI: 1.23-1.84), duration DM >= 10 years (OR =2.01, 95% CI: 1.61-2.51), BMI >= 30 kg/m2 (OR =1.26, 95% CI: 1.02-1.55), ASCVD/CKD (OR =1.49, 95% CI: 1.01-2.04), history of diabetic coma (OR =12.97, 95% CI: 1.89-88.99) and presence of disability ( OR =1.40, 95% CI: 1.14-1.73). In T2DM, the type of antidiabetic therapy (ADT) prior to COVID-19 (last visit before the development of infection) had a significant impact: Insulin therapy (OR = 1.64, 95% CI: 1.30-2.07), sulfonylureas (SU) (OR =1.51, 95% CI: 1.23-1.84));dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (iDPP-4) therapy (OR =0.57, 95% CI: 0.39-0.83) and sodium- glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor (iSGLT2) therapy (OR =0.64, 95% CI: 0.46-0.88). Vaccination was the most important protective factor in both types of DM: DM1 OR =0.19, 95% CI: 0.06-0.59;SD2 OR =0.20, 95% CI: 0.16-0.26. CONCLUSION: The common risk factor for fatal outcome in both DM1 and DM2 was age >= 65 years;in DM1 - history of hypertension and DFS, in DM2 - male sex, diabetes duration >= 10 years, BMI >= 30 kg/m2, history of ASCVD/CKD and diabetic coma, disability. In T2DM, significant differences in risk were observed depending on the type of ADT: insulin and SU therapy were factors that increased the risk of death, whereas therapy with iDPP-4 and iSGLT2 reduced the risk of death. Vaccination reduced the risk of death in DM1 and DM2 by 5.2 and 5-fold, respectively.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The coronavirus pandemic has had an extremely negative impact on the patients with diabetes mellitus (DM both in terms of a more severe course of COVID -19 and an increased risk of death. AIM: Analysis of risk factors for death due to COVID -19 in patients with DM type 1 and type 2 (DM1 and DM2). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of the database of the national diabetes register (NDR), which included DM patients with COVID-19 and reported virus infection outcome (recovery/or death) in 15 712 DM1 and 322 279 DM2 patients during a 2-year follow-up period (01/02/2020 to 03/04/2022) (discharge date)). RESULT(S): Case fatality rate in patients with DM, who underwent COVID -19 was 17.1% (DM1-8.8%;DM2-17.5%). As a result of multivariate regression analysis of seven significant factors in DM1 and thirteen in DM2 (evaluated by univariate anlisys), a number of the most important predictors of risk for fatal outcome were identified: in DM1 these were age >=65 years (OR =4.01, 95% CI: 1.42-11.36), presence of arterial hypertension (AH) (OR =2.72, 95% CI: 1.03 -7.16) and diabetic foot syndrome (DFS) (OR = 7.22, 95% CI: 1.98-26.29);for T2DM: age >= 65 years (OR =2.53, 95% CI: 1.96-3.27), male (OR =1.51, 95% CI: 1.23-1.84), duration DM >=10 years (OR =2.01, 95% CI: 1.61-2.51), BMI >= 30 kg/m2 (OR =1.26, 95% CI: 1.02-1.55), ASCVD/CKD (OR =1.49, 95% CI: 1.01-2.04), history of diabetic coma (OR =12.97, 95% CI: 1.89-88.99) and presence of disability (OR =1.40, 95% CI: 1.14-1.73). In T2DM, the type of antidiabetic therapy (ADT) prior to COVID -19 (last visit before the development of infection) had a significant impact: Insulin therapy (OR = 1.64, 95% CI: 1.30-2.07), sulfonylureas (SU) (OR =1.51, 95% CI: 1.23-1.84));dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (iDPP-4) therapy (OR =0.57, 95% CI: 0.39-0.83) and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor (iSGLT2) therapy (OR =0.64, 95% CI: 0.46-0.88). Vaccination was the most important protective factor in both types of DM: DM1 OR =0.19, 95% CI: 0.06-0.59;SD2 OR =0.20, 95% CI: 0.16-0.26. CONCLUSION(S): The common risk factor for fatal outcome in both DM1 and DM2 was age >=65 years;in DM1 - history of hypertension and DFS, in DM2 - male sex, diabetes duration >=10 years, BMI >=30 kg/m2, history of ASCVD/CKD and diabetic coma, disability. In T2DM, significant differences in risk were observed depending on the type of ADT: insulin and SU therapy were factors that increased the risk of death, whereas therapy with iDPP-4 and iSGLT2 reduced the risk of death. Vaccination reduced the risk of death in DM1 and DM2 by 5.2 and 5-fold, respectively.Copyright © Endocrinology Research Centre, 2022.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The coronavirus pandemic has had an extremely negative impact on the patients with diabetes mellitus (DM both in terms of a more severe course of COVID -19 and an increased risk of death. AIM: Analysis of risk factors for death due to COVID -19 in patients with DM type 1 and type 2 (DM1 and DM2). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of the database of the national diabetes register (NDR), which included DM patients with COVID-19 and reported virus infection outcome (recovery/or death) in 15 712 DM1 and 322 279 DM2 patients during a 2-year follow-up period (01/02/2020 to 03/04/2022) (discharge date)). RESULT(S): Case fatality rate in patients with DM, who underwent COVID -19 was 17.1% (DM1-8.8%;DM2-17.5%). As a result of multivariate regression analysis of seven significant factors in DM1 and thirteen in DM2 (evaluated by univariate anlisys), a number of the most important predictors of risk for fatal outcome were identified: in DM1 these were age >=65 years (OR =4.01, 95% CI: 1.42-11.36), presence of arterial hypertension (AH) (OR =2.72, 95% CI: 1.03 -7.16) and diabetic foot syndrome (DFS) (OR = 7.22, 95% CI: 1.98-26.29);for T2DM: age >= 65 years (OR =2.53, 95% CI: 1.96-3.27), male (OR =1.51, 95% CI: 1.23-1.84), duration DM >=10 years (OR =2.01, 95% CI: 1.61-2.51), BMI >= 30 kg/m2 (OR =1.26, 95% CI: 1.02-1.55), ASCVD/CKD (OR =1.49, 95% CI: 1.01-2.04), history of diabetic coma (OR =12.97, 95% CI: 1.89-88.99) and presence of disability (OR =1.40, 95% CI: 1.14-1.73). In T2DM, the type of antidiabetic therapy (ADT) prior to COVID -19 (last visit before the development of infection) had a significant impact: Insulin therapy (OR = 1.64, 95% CI: 1.30-2.07), sulfonylureas (SU) (OR =1.51, 95% CI: 1.23-1.84));dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (iDPP-4) therapy (OR =0.57, 95% CI: 0.39-0.83) and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor (iSGLT2) therapy (OR =0.64, 95% CI: 0.46-0.88). Vaccination was the most important protective factor in both types of DM: DM1 OR =0.19, 95% CI: 0.06-0.59;SD2 OR =0.20, 95% CI: 0.16-0.26. CONCLUSION(S): The common risk factor for fatal outcome in both DM1 and DM2 was age >=65 years;in DM1 - history of hypertension and DFS, in DM2 - male sex, diabetes duration >=10 years, BMI >=30 kg/m2, history of ASCVD/CKD and diabetic coma, disability. In T2DM, significant differences in risk were observed depending on the type of ADT: insulin and SU therapy were factors that increased the risk of death, whereas therapy with iDPP-4 and iSGLT2 reduced the risk of death. Vaccination reduced the risk of death in DM1 and DM2 by 5.2 and 5-fold, respectively. Copyright © Endocrinology Research Centre, 2022.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The coronavirus pandemic has had an extremely negative impact on the patients with diabetes mellitus (DM both in terms of a more severe course of COVID -19 and an increased risk of death. AIM: Analysis of risk factors for death due to COVID -19 in patients with DM type 1 and type 2 (DM1 and DM2). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of the database of the national diabetes register (NDR), which included DM patients with COVID-19 and reported virus infection outcome (recovery/or death) in 15 712 DM1 and 322 279 DM2 patients during a 2-year follow-up period (01/02/2020 to 03/04/2022) (discharge date)). RESULT(S): Case fatality rate in patients with DM, who underwent COVID -19 was 17.1% (DM1-8.8%;DM2-17.5%). As a result of multivariate regression analysis of seven significant factors in DM1 and thirteen in DM2 (evaluated by univariate anlisys), a number of the most important predictors of risk for fatal outcome were identified: in DM1 these were age >=65 years (OR =4.01, 95% CI: 1.42-11.36), presence of arterial hypertension (AH) (OR =2.72, 95% CI: 1.03 -7.16) and diabetic foot syndrome (DFS) (OR = 7.22, 95% CI: 1.98-26.29);for T2DM: age >= 65 years (OR =2.53, 95% CI: 1.96-3.27), male (OR =1.51, 95% CI: 1.23-1.84), duration DM >=10 years (OR =2.01, 95% CI: 1.61-2.51), BMI >= 30 kg/m2 (OR =1.26, 95% CI: 1.02-1.55), ASCVD/CKD (OR =1.49, 95% CI: 1.01-2.04), history of diabetic coma (OR =12.97, 95% CI: 1.89-88.99) and presence of disability (OR =1.40, 95% CI: 1.14-1.73). In T2DM, the type of antidiabetic therapy (ADT) prior to COVID -19 (last visit before the development of infection) had a significant impact: Insulin therapy (OR = 1.64, 95% CI: 1.30-2.07), sulfonylureas (SU) (OR =1.51, 95% CI: 1.23-1.84));dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (iDPP-4) therapy (OR =0.57, 95% CI: 0.39-0.83) and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor (iSGLT2) therapy (OR =0.64, 95% CI: 0.46-0.88). Vaccination was the most important protective factor in both types of DM: DM1 OR =0.19, 95% CI: 0.06-0.59;SD2 OR =0.20, 95% CI: 0.16-0.26. CONCLUSION(S): The common risk factor for fatal outcome in both DM1 and DM2 was age >=65 years;in DM1 - history of hypertension and DFS, in DM2 - male sex, diabetes duration >=10 years, BMI >=30 kg/m2, history of ASCVD/CKD and diabetic coma, disability. In T2DM, significant differences in risk were observed depending on the type of ADT: insulin and SU therapy were factors that increased the risk of death, whereas therapy with iDPP-4 and iSGLT2 reduced the risk of death. Vaccination reduced the risk of death in DM1 and DM2 by 5.2 and 5-fold, respectively. Copyright © Endocrinology Research Centre, 2022.
ABSTRACT
A dangerous viral disease COVID-19, caused by a new RNA coronavirus SARS-COV-2, has been actively spreading in the world since December 2019. The main manifestations of this disease are bilateral pneumonia, often accompanied by the development of acute respiratory syndrome and respiratory failure. Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) are at high risk of infection with the SARS-COV-2 virus, severe illness and death. Maintaining of target glycemic levels is the most important factor in a favorable outcome of COVID-19 in both type 1 and type 2 DM. The choice of antihyperglycemic therapy in a patient with DM in the acute period of COVID-19 depends on the initial therapy, the severity of hyperglycemia, the severity of the viral infection and the patient's clinical condition. The article presents the recommendations of the board of experts of the Russian Association of Endocrinologists on glycemic control and the choice of antihyperglycemic therapy in patients with type 2 DM and COVID-19, and also on the use of glucocorticosteroids used in the treatment of COVID-19 in patients with type 2 DM. Copyright © Endocrinology Research Centre, 2022.
ABSTRACT
The aim To study the association of demographic, clinical, and laboratory factors and the use of glucose-lowering drugs and anti-coronavirus disease (COVID-19) vaccination with the COVID-19-related case fatality rate (CFR) in diabetes mellitus (DM) patients. Methods This study is a nationwide observational cohort study based on the data from the National Diabetes Register (NDR) that is the database containing online clinical information about the population with DM. The outcomes (death or recovery) for COVID-19 were registered in 235,248 patients with DM [type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), n = 11,058;type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), n = 224,190] from March 20, 2020, until November 25, 2021. The unadjusted odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to estimate the risk factors for CFR. Then the ranging of significant factors was performed and the most vulnerable groups of factors for the lethal outcome were chosen. Results The CFR due to COVID-19 was 8.1% in T1DM and 15.3% in T2DM. Increased CFR was associated with the male population [OR = 1.25 (95% CI: 1.09–1.44) in T1DM and 1.18 (95% CI: 1.15–1.21) in T2DM], age ≥65 years [OR = 4.44 (95% CI: 3.75–5.24) in T1DM and 3.18 (95% CI: 3.09–3.26) in T2DM], DM duration ≥10 years [OR = 2.46 (95% CI: 2.06–2.95) in T1DM and 2.11 (95% CI: 2.06–2.16) in T2DM], body mass index (BMI) ≥30 kg/m2 [OR = 1.95 (95% CI: 1.52–2.50)] in T1DM, HbA1c ≥7% [OR = 1.35 (95% CI: 1.29–1.43)] in T2DM. The atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) were associated with higher CFR in T1DM but not in T2DM. The pre-COVID-19 glucose-lowering therapy in T2DM was differently associated with CFR (OR): 0.61 (95% CI: 0.59–0.62) for metformin, 0.59 (95% CI: 0.57–0.61) for dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4 inhibitors), 0.46 (95% CI: 0.44–0.49) for sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, 0.38 (95% CI: 0.29–0.51) for glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (arGLP-1), 1.34 (95% CI: 1.31–1.37) for sulfonylurea (SU), and 1.47 (95% CI: 1.43–1.51) for insulin. Anti-COVID-19 vaccination was associated with a lower fatality risk in both DM types: OR = 0.07 (95% CI: 0.03–0.20) in T1DM and OR = 0.19 (95% CI: 0.17–0.22) in T2DM. Conclusions The results of our study suggest that increased COVID-19-related fatality risk in both T1DM and T2DM patients associated with the male population, older age, longer DM duration, and absence of anti-COVID-19 vaccination. In T2DM, pre-COVID-19 glucose-lowering therapy with metformin, DPP-4 inhibitors, SGLT2 inhibitors, and arGLP-1 had a positive effect on the risk of death. The most vulnerable combination of risk factors for lethal outcome in both DM types was vaccine absence + age ≥65 years + DM duration ≥10 years.
ABSTRACT
Diabetes mellitus stays an important medical, economic and social problem worldwide. Infectious diseases in people with diabetes mellitus are often more severe with an increased frequency of hospitalizations and complications. The presence of chronic hyperglycemia leads to decreased immune function and an increased predisposition to infections. Infections lead to uncontrolled hyperglycemia, which worsens the course of infections, thus forming a vicious circle of violations. Mass vaccination with an emphasis on people belonging to the high-risk group reduces the number of infected and, hospitalized people, and also has clear economic advantages. However, in many countries the proportion of vaccinated remains low. Vaccine prophylaxis in Russia is regulated by a number of regulatory legal acts, of which the main one is Federal Law No. 157-FZ of September 17, 1998 (edited on July 2, 2021) "About Immunoprophylaxis of Infectious Diseases". Each country has a National Vaccination Schedule, which shows a routine vaccination schedule at a specific age against infections that are widespread and / or pose a serious threat to health and life), as well as a National Epidemic Indication Vaccination Schedule. In Russia, these documents are approved by Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation of March 21, 2014 N 125. "About the approval of the national calendar of preventive vaccinations and the calendar of preventive vaccinations for epidemic indications." This article discusses vaccination against the most socially significant infections associated with a high worldwide prevalence and increased risk among people with diabetes.
ABSTRACT
A dangerous viral disease COVID-19, caused by a new RNA coronavirus SARS-COV-2, has been actively spreading in the world since December 2019. The main manifestations of this disease are bilateral pneumonia, often accompanied by the development of acute respiratory syndrome and respiratory failure. Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) are at high risk of infection with the SARS-COV-2 virus, severe illness and death. Maintaining of target glycemic levels is the most important factor in a favorable outcome of COVID-19 in both type 1 and type 2 DM. The choice of antihyperglycemic therapy in a patient with DM in the acute period of COVID-19 depends on the initial therapy, the severity of hyperglycemia, the severity of the viral infection and the patient's clinical condition. The article presents the recommendations of the board of experts of the Russian Association of Endocrinologists on glycemic control and the choice of antihyperglycemic therapy in patients with type 2 DM and COVID-19, and also on the use of glucocorticosteroids used in the treatment of COVID-19 in patients with type 2 DM.
ABSTRACT
Coding of the causes of death of patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) in the Russian Federation is one of the long-discussed problems, due to the comorbidity of diabetes and cardiovascular diseases (CVD) and a number of contradictions in the key regulatory documents regulating the statistics of mortality in this category of patients, which acquires particular relevance in the context of the coronavirus pandemic, due to its negative impact on the outcomes of the course of COVID-19 and mortality risks. In pursuance of the decisions of the Minutes of the meeting of the working group under the project committee of the National Project «Health» on identifying patterns in the formation of mortality rates of the population dated January 20, 2021 No. 1, chaired by Deputy Prime Minister of the Russian Federation T.A. Golikova, experts of two directions - endocrinology and pathological anatomy, prepared a Draft of agreed recommendations on the Rules for coding the causes of death of patients with diabetes, causing the greatest problems in terms of the use of ICD-10 when choosing the initial cause of death, including in the case of death from CVD and COVID-19.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Less than a year has passed since the start of the new coronavirus infection COVID-19 pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2. First published research results demonstrate a frequent increase in glycemia in patients without previously diagnosed carbohydrate metabolism disorders. A possible relationship between the carbohydrate metabolism state and the course of COVID-19 is considered. AIM: To identify the incidence of known and newly diagnosed diabetes mellitus (DM) in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 and evaluate the relationship between glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), inflammation markers and infectious disease severity. METHODS: A single-center, cross-sectional, retrospective study included 155 patients with confirmed COVID-19 and bilateral polysegmental viral pneumonia hospitalized in the Endocrinology Research Centre, Russian Federation. Diagnosis of carbohydrate metabolism disorders was based on the HbA1c level, blood glucose level at admission (BGA) and fasting plasma glucose (FPG). Patients were divided into 2 groups: without the previously diagnosed DM (n=129, 83.3%) and with known history of DM (n=26, 16,7%). Patients without previously diagnosed DM were divided into subgroups according to HbA1c levels: ≤6,0% (Group A), >6,0% HbA1c, <6.5% (Group B), ≥6,5% (Group C). Additionally, insulin, interleukin 6 (IL-6) and D-dimer levels were measured in all patients. Blood oxygen saturation (SpO2) was measured by pulsoximetry, computerized tomography of lungs with calculation of lung parenchyma damage percentage. RESULTS: Type 2 DM was previously established in 16.7% of all included patients. Among patients without DM history, DM was revealed in 8 patients (5.2%), based on HbA1c, FPG and BGA. In 66 patients (42.6%) we observed no changes in carbohydrate metabolism. In 55 patients, the interpretation of carbohydrate metabolism state was difficult due to inconsistency of HbA1c level with FPG and BGA: In particular, the level of HbA1c ≥ 6.5% (which corresponds to the diagnostic threshold of the DM) was detected in 19 patients (12,2%) with normal FPG and BGA. No true stress hyperglycemia on admission and according to FPG was reported. Despite the presence of confirmed DM, HbA1c levels positively correlated with inflammatory markers (erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein, IL-6) and SpO2. Patients with a HbA1c ≥6.5% without DM history had the most severe course of the disease: Longest duration of hospitalization, largest damage of the pulmonary tissue, and high lethality. CONCLUSION: The incidence of DM among patients hospitalized with COVID-19 was 21.9% (16.7% had previous diagnosis of DM, 5.2% - newly diagnosed), which is 1.5 times higher than in general population in a comparable age category. It is difficult to assess the carbohydrate metabolism disorders in patients in acute infectious period. An increased level of HbA1c (≥6.5%), first detected in the acute period of infection, in combination with normal FPG and BGA parameters, cannot be a diagnostic criterion and requires dynamic monitoring. HbA1c level can be considered as a predictive factor of COVID-19 severity, independent of DM.
ABSTRACT
The agreement of experts of the Eurasian Association of Therapists (EAT) discusses pathogenesis and treatment of COVID-19. Modern data on the characteristics of cardiovascular, kidney, respiratory damage in SARS-infected CoV-2 are presented. The tactics of managing patients initially having cardiovascular diseases, diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, bronchial asthma, chronic kidney disease are discussed in detail. The article presents data on drug interaction of drugs.
Subject(s)
Asthma , COVID-19 , Diabetes Mellitus , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive , Humans , SARS-CoV-2ABSTRACT
Progressive decrease in the weight and functional reserve of β-cells is one of the main pathogenetic mechanisms of development of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2). The rate of progression of these processes is strictly individual, which largely determines the course of DM2 and the effectiveness of the therapy. As a rule, apoptosis and necrosis are the main mechanisms of β-cell damage and death in CD2. At the same time, recent studies allow us to consider the destruction and death of β-cells as the outcome of other types of programmed cell death (PCG), the role of innate immunity in the Genesis of CD2 IS actively discussed. This article provides an overview of the data of domestic and foreign literature of recent years regarding the molecular, intracellular characteristics of different types of β-cell PCG in CD2. The results of studies aimed at studying the possible factors and processes leading to their launch are presented.